Looks like deep diving crank bait waters. ;-)
Commented on My happy place
Commented on Got to fish a local tornament today w...
Commented on With all our talk of staying on your ...
Commented on Update: today was an epic fail. Zero ...
Commented on Just competed in my first BFL!
Posted
Commented on I had 14-03 today. My stuff worked. T...
Posted
Commented on Did some pre- fishing on the Potomac ...
Commented on Is there even a debate anymore about ...
13 May 08:43
I love technology. That 4+ pound drop in cut weight on the non-FFS day speaks volumes.
I love the MLF format—one day without and one day with. You have to be able to use it all. I expect pros to continually adapt and learn. Put in the time and usually you find success.
Rick Clunn's perspective is spot-on. He reminds us how "Minnesota was trying to outlaw his little green boxes" back when the first fish finders appeared. Now those are standard equipment. He talks about FFS "adding to our knowledge" and helping us understand what's happening underwater instead of guessing. As he noted, with traditional approaches, "we were right only 20-30 percent of the time."
We've seen this controversy with every technological advance—GPS, depth finders, even modern rods and reels, lures faced resistance. Each time, the sport adapted and grew.